Containers and seedling quality for Quercus crassipes Bonpl.

Authors

  • Roselia Venancio Nabor División de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. México
  • Dante Arturo Rodríguez Trejo Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
  • Leopoldo Mohedano Caballero División de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. México
  • Edgar Arturo Sánchez Moreno División de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v13i69.966

Keywords:

Container size, forest nurseries, Quercus crassipes, seedling quality., technified nurseries, forest nurseries, container size, quality indicators, Quercus crassipes Bonpl, Seedling quality

Abstract

Mexico is the richest country in oak species and they span over its territory, however, there is scarce research about its propagation and its seedling quality. Was studied this last in Quercus crassipes Bonpl., in two sizes of containers: large (210 mL) and small (150 mL). The growing media was composted pine bark (60 %), vermiculite (30 %) and agrolite (10 %). During the establishment phase was applied starter fertilizer (9-45-15), 100 ppm P, 21.97 ppm N, 62.23 ppm K. During the growing phase, was applied growth fertilizer (20-20-20), 150 ppm N, 66 ppm P, 123 ppm K. In the hardening phase, was used finalizer fertilizer (4-25-35), 150 ppm de K, 20 ppm de N y 56.87 ppm P. Were measured height, caliper, number of leaves, foliar area, foliar dry weight, tap root length, number of lateral roots, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and total dry weight. Were calculated shoot/root ratio, slenderness coefficient and Dickson index. Was utilized a randomized complete block experimental design (four replications) and performed an analysis of variance and the Tukey test (SAS). The larger container showed larger (p≤0.05) height (19.2 and 16 cm), caliper (4.3 and 3.6 mm) and tap root length. The other variables exhibited no significant differences. Overall the plant showed good seedling quality indicators, but is preferred the large one, for there is research evidence for other species of its higher field survival. Large containers and the growing media and fertilization employed may be used to produce quality seedlings, while the indicators obtained may be used as reference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arizaga, S., J. Martínez C., M. Salcedo C. y M. Á. Bello G. 2009. Manual de la Biodiversidad de Encinos Michoacanos. Semarnat, INE. México, D.F., México. 147 p.

Cuesta, B., P. Villar-Salvador, J. Puértolas, D. F. Jacobs and J. M. R. Benayas. 2010. Why do large, Nitrogen rich seedlings better resist stressful transplanting conditions? A physiological analysis in two functionally contrasting Mediterranean forest species. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 71-80. Doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.002.

De Jesús A., F., R. Ignacio H., D. A. Rodríguez T. y L. Mohedano C. 2021. Calidad de planta de Quercus rugosa Née en vivero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 12(67): 147-167. Doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v12i67.967.

Del Campo, A. D., R. M. Navarro and C. J. Ceacero. 2010. Seedling quality and field performance of commercial stocklots of containerized holm oak (Quecus ilex L.) in Mediterranean Spain: an approach for establishing a quality standard. New Forests 39: 19-37. Doi: 10.1007/s11056-009-9152-9.

García, E. 1981. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen: para adaptarlo a la República Mexicana (UNAM). México, D.F., México. 246 p.

Jacobs, D. F., K. F. Salifu and J. R. Seifert. 2005. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New Forests, 30, 235-251. Doi: 10.1007/s11056-005-5419-y.

Landis, T. D., R. K. Dumroese and D. L. Haase. 2010. The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Vol. 7. Seedling Processing, Storage, and Outplanting Agricultural Handbook 674. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Washington, DC, USA. 200 p.

Prieto-Ruiz, J. A., J. L. García R., J. M. Mejía B., A. S. Huchín y J. L. Aguilar V. 2009. Producción de planta del género Pinus en vivero en clima templado frío. Publicación Especial No. 28. Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana INIFAP-SAGARPA. Durango, Dgo., México. 48 p.

Ramírez C., A. y D. A. Rodríguez T. 2004. Efecto de la calidad de planta, exposición y micrositio en una plantación de Quercus rugosa. Revista Chapingo. Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 10(1): 5-11. https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/?section=articles&subsec=issues&numero=29&articulo=403 (20 de julio de 2021).

Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. 2008. Indicadores de Calidad de Planta Forestal. Mundi Prensa-UACH. México, D.F., México. 156 p.

Rueda, S., A., J. de D. Benavides S., J. A. Prieto R., J. T. Sáenz R., G. Orozco G. y A. Molina C. 2012. Calidad de planta producida en los viveros forestales de Jalisco. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 3(14): 69-82. Doi:10.29298/rmcf.v3i14.475.

Statistical Analysis System Institute (SAS Institute) 2002. SAS Program v. 9.0. Cary, NC, USA.

Stewart, J. D. and P. Y. Bernier. 1995. Gas exchange and water relations of three sizes of containerized Picea mariana seedlings subjected to atmospheric and edaphic water stress under controlled conditions. Annals of Forest Sciences 52: 1-9. https://bit.ly/32lK31c (20 de julio de 2021).

Velázquez R., J. M., D. A. Rodríguez T. y R. Bonilla B. 1996. Evaluación de Quercus crassipes Humb. et Bonpl. en vivero bajo diferentes tipos de sustrato e intensidades de luz. Revista Chapingo. Serie Ciencias Forestales 1: 97-109.

Zavala C., F. 2003. Identificación de Encinos de México. División de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Chapingo, Edo de Méx., México. 190 p.

Zavala C., F. 2007. Guía de los Encinos de la Sierra de Tepotzotlán, México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Chapingo, Edo de Méx., México. 89 p.

Indicador

Published

2022-01-10 — Updated on 2022-04-05

Versions

How to Cite

Venancio Nabor, Roselia, Dante Arturo Rodríguez Trejo, Leopoldo Mohedano Caballero, and Edgar Arturo Sánchez Moreno. (2022) 2022. “Containers and Seedling Quality for Quercus Crassipes Bonpl”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Forestales 13 (69). México, ME:201-11. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v13i69.966.

Issue

Section

Research note