Repeatability of useful characteristics as morphological descriptors in Cedrela odorata L. clones.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v13i69.938Keywords:
Clustering, principal component analysis, grafting, provenances, superior clones registration, intellectual propertyAbstract
There are advances in the genetic improvement of Cedrela odorata in Mexico The improved material must have distinguishable and stable characteristics when it grows in different places to obtain intellectual property. The objective of this study was to assess the repeatability of morphological descriptors in C. odorata clones whose vegetative reproduction has been more successful by grafting, as superior genotypes can be identified for the registration of their intellectual property. 90 clones produced by grafting at two contrasting evaluation sites (clonal trials) and in a clonal bank were assessed. 19 characters were selected: 12 quantitative and 7 qualitative; related to growth, stem, crown and leaves; only leaves were evaluated in the clonal bank. Most of the characters showed variation coefficients >20 %, which is a high level of phenotypic variability among clones. Principal Component Analysis revealed that the descriptors that contributed significantly and were consistent in the three sites were leaf length and width, petiole length and width of secondary leaflets; in the two trials diameter and straightness of the stem also contributed. The cluster analysis showed little relationship between the morphological characters with the groups of clones and provenances formed in each evaluation site. The clusters formed by the cluster analysis were distinctive at the three sites, and no clones could be consistently discriminated between sites. Genotype by environment interaction and the different rootstock in each ramet could reduce the possibility of repeatability in the characters and the registration of superior clones.
Downloads
References
Anushka, P. V. A., K. K. Liyanage, S. P. Withanage and B. W. Baddewithana. 2017. Analysis of phenotypic diversity of selected hevea accessions from irrdb 1981 germplasm collection conserved in Sri Lanka. International Proceedings of IRC 2017 1(1): 203-212. Doi:10.22302/ppk.procirc2017.v1i1.452.
Assogbadjo, A. E., T. Kyndt, B. Sinsin, G. Gheysen and P. Van Damme. 2006. Patterns of genetic and morphometric diversity in baobab (Adansonia digitata) populations across different climatic zones of Benin (West Africa). Annals of Botany 97(5): 819-830. Doi:10.1093/aob/mcl043.
Baldanzi, M., M. L. Myczkowski, M. Salvini and M. Macchia. 2015. Description of 90 inbred lines of castor plant (Ricinus communis L.). Euphytica 202(1): 13-33. Doi:10.1007/s10681-014-1196-z.
Bayramzadeh, V., P. Attarod, M. T. Ahmadi, M. Ghadiri, R. Akbari, T. Safarkar and A. Shirvany. 2012. Variation of leaf morphological traits in natural populations of Fagus orientalis Lipsky in the Caspian forests of Northern Iran. Annals of Forest Research 55(1): 33-42. Doi:10.15287/afr.2012.73.
Bennadji, Z. 2003. Legislación sobre recursos genéticos forestales en Latinoamérica. Investigación Agraria. Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 12(3): 135-143. https://bit.ly/3mn7pdB
(17 de enero de 2020).
Bonga, J. M. 1982. Vegetative propagation in relation to juvenility, maturity, and rejuvenation. In: Bonga, J. M. and Durzan, D. J. (eds.). Tissue culture in forestry. Forestry Sciences (5). Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 387-412. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3538-4_13.
Chimello, A. M., J. G. Jesus, P. E. Teodoro, A. A. B. Rossil, K. L. Araújol, T. N. Marostega, L. G. Neves and M. A. A. Barelli. 2017. Morphological descriptors and ISSR molecular markers in the evaluation of genetic variability of Tectona grandis genotypes. Genetics and Molecular Research 16(2): 1–16. Doi: 10.4238/gmr16029665.
Crossa, J. and J. Franco.2004. Statistical methods for classifying genotypes. Euphytica 137: 19-37. Doi:10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040500.86428.e8.
Darrouy P., N., M. Castro V., R. Cautín M., L. Kort S. y R. Bozzolo A. 2010. Efecto de la posición de la yema y de la poda en plantas de aguacate destinadas a la clonación. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 33(3): 249-256. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-73802010000300009 (8 de enero de 2021).
De la Torre, A. 2013. Estructura poblacional , diversidad y flujo genético en poblaciones ribereñas de cedro (Cedrela odorata L.). In: Antonio T., J. G. (ed.). Reporte Manu. San Diego Zoo Global Peru, SERNANP. Lima, Perú. pp. 80-107.
Forner V., J. B. 1984. Interacciones entre el injerto y el patrón en los agrios. Hoja divulgativa 9/84 HD. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion. Moncada, Valencia, España. 19 p.
Franco, T. L. y R. Hidalgo (eds.). 2003. Análisis estadístico de datos de caracterización morfológica de recursos fitogenéticos. Boletín Técnico No. 8. Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos (IPGRI). Cali, Colombia. 89 p.
Galván H., D. M., M. A. Macedo V., F. F. Núñez de C.G., A. Sánchez G. and P. Octavio A. 2018. Morphological variation of Cedrela odorata (Meliaceae): contrast between natural and managed populations. Acta Botanica Mexicana 125: 157-171. Doi: 10.21829/abm125.2018.1330.
Hernández G., Z., J. Sahagún C., P. Espinosa R., M. T. Colinas L. y J. E. Rodríguez P. 2014. Efecto del patrón en el rendimiento y tamaño de fruto en pepino injertado. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 37(1): 41-47. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-73802014000100007 (20 de octubre de 2020).
Hernández-Zaragoza, P., J. R. Valdez-Lazalde, A. Aldrete y T. Martínez-Trinidad. 2019. Evaluación multicriterio y multiobjetivo para optimizar la selección de áreas para establecer plantaciones forestales. Madera y Bosques 25:(2):e2521819. Doi: 10.21829/myb.2019.2521819.
Hovenden, M. J. and J. K. Vander S. 2003. Nature vs nurture in the leaf morphology of Southern beech, Nothofagus cunninghamii (Nothofagaceae). New Phytologist 161(2): 585-594. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00931.x.
Kjær, E. D., H. R. Siegismund and V. Suangtho. 1996. A multivariate study on genetic variation in teak (Tectona grandis (L.). Silvae Genetica 45(5-6): 361-368. https://bit.ly/3mn7pdB (20 de marzo de 2021).
Lo Bianco, R. and F. Mirabella. 2018. Use of leaf and fruit morphometric analysis to identify and classify white mulberry (Morus alba L.) genotypes. Agriculture 8(10): 157. Doi: 10.3390/agriculture8100157.
López-Santiago, J., R. Nieto-Ángel, A. F. Barrientos-Priego, E. Rodríguez-Pérez, M. T. Colinas-Leon, M. W. Borys y F. González-Andrés. 2008. Selección de variables morfológicas para la caracterización del tejocote (Crataegus spp.). Revista Chapingo, Serie Horticultura 14(2): 97-111. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/609/60911556001.pdf (20 de marzo de 2021).
Méndez E., C. y V. Sánchez M. 2012. Descriptores morfológicos de Cedrela odorata L. para México. Folleto Técnico No. 7. Cenid-Comef, INIFAP. México, D.F., México. 52 p.
Navarro, C., F. Montagnini and G. Hernández. 2004. Genetic variability of Cedrela odorata Linnaeus: results of early performance of provenances and families from Mesoamerica grown in association with coffee. Forest, Ecology and Management 92(2-3): 217-227. Doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.037.
Núñez-Colín, C. A. y D. Escobedo-López. 2011. Uso correcto del análisis clúster en la caracterización de germoplasma vegetal. Agronomía Mesoamericana 22(2): 415–427. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S1659-13212011000200018&script=sci_abstract&tlng=es (6 de marzo de 2021).
Núñez-Colín, C. A. y D. Escobedo-López. 2014. Caracterización de germoplasma vegetal: la piedra angular en el estudio de los recursos fitogenéticos. Acta Agrícola y Pecuaria 1(1): 1–6. http://aap.uaem.mx/index.php/aap/article/view/1 (4 de febrero de 2021).
Pennington, T. D. y J. Sarukhán K. 2005. Árboles tropicales de México: manual para la identificación de las principales especies. 3a edición. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Fondo de Cultura Económica. México, D. F., México. 523 p.
Ramírez-García, C., G. Vera-Castillo, F. Carrillo-Anzures and O. S. Magaña-Torres. 2008. El cedro rojo (Cedrela odorata L.) como alternativa de reconversión de terrenos agrícolas en el sur de Tamaulipas. Agricultura Técnica en México 34(2): 243-250. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0568-25172008000200011 (15 de febrero de 2021).
Said A., A., A. Oukabli, F. Gaboun, M. H. Simard and C. El Modafar. 2013. Phenotypic biodiversity of an endemic wild pear, Pyrus mamorensis Trab., in North-Western Morocco using morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60(3): 927-938. Doi: 10.1007/s10722-012-9889-4.
Sampayo M., S., J. López U., V. Sánchez M. and M. Jiménez C. 2019. Genetic parameters of growth, and resistance to the shoot borer, in young clones of the tree Cedrela odorata (Meliaceae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 67(3): 554–561. Doi: 10.15517/RBT.V67I3.32053.
Sánchez M., V. y C. Velázquez E. 1998. Evaluación de dos insecticidas biológicos en el control de Hypsiphylla grandella (Zeller), barrenador de brotes de las Meliaceas. Ciencia Forestal en México 23(83): 33-39. http://cienciasforestales.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/forestales/article/view/961 (12 de marzo de 2021).
Sánchez M., V. y X. García C. 2009. Ecuaciones de volumen para plantaciones jóvenes de Cedrela odorata L. (Cedro rojo) en Tezonapa Veracruz. In: Cueto, W., Prieto R., J. Á. y L. V. Macías G. (comps.). Memoria de la IVa. Reunión Nacional de Innovación Agrícola y Forestal. Saltillo, Coah., México. p. 363.
Sánchez M., V., J. A. Honorato S. y J. López U. 2019. Selección de clones de Cedrela odorata L. en el Golfo y Sureste de México. In: Martínez H., J. y C. Hernández H. (comps.). Investigaciones Científicas y Agrotecnológicas para la Seguridad Alimentaria. INIFAP. Huimanguillo, Tabs., México. Núm. 1. pp. 1003-1012.
Santos, R. C., J. L. Pires and R. X. Correa. 2012. Morphological characterization of leaf, flower, fruit and seed traits among Brazilian Theobroma L. species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59(3): 327-345. Doi: 10.1007/s10722-011-9685-6.
Statistical Analysis SystemInstitute (SAS). 2002. SAS/STAT Computer Software. Release 9.00. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA. n/p.
Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas (SNICS). 2014. https://www.gob.mx/snics/prensa/marcadores-moleculares-para-la-identificacion-de-variedades-vegetales (20 de septiembre de 2020).
Schmutz, U. and P. Lüdders. 1999. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth, leaf gas exchange, and mineral composition of grafted mango rootstocks (var. '13-1' and 'Turpentine'). Gartenbauwiss 64(2): 60-64. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=296160 (18 diciembre 2020).
Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA). 1996. Ley Federal de Variedades Vegetales. 25 de octubre. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Secretaría de Gobernación México, D. F., México. https://www.gob.mx/snics/acciones-y-programas/ley-federal-de-variedades-vegetales-y-su-reglamento (20 de agosto de 2021).
Sreekanth, P. M., M. Balasundaran and P. A. Nazeem. 2014. Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India. Journal of Forestry Research 25(4): 805-812. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0528-0.
Toili, M. E. M., F. K. Rimberia, A. B. Nyende and D. Sila. 2016. Morphological diversity of mango germplasm from the Upper Athi River region of eastern Kenya: An analysis based on non-fruit descriptors. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 16(2): 10913-10935. Doi: 10.18697/ajfand.74.13755.
White, T. L., T. W. Adams and D. B. Neale. 2007. Forest Genetics. CAB International, Oxford, England. 682 p.
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-05 (4)
- 2022-03-31 (3)
- 2022-03-30 (2)
- 2022-01-10 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales –with no exception– are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales (for example, include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales.
For all the above, the authors shall send the form of Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: ciencia.forestal2@inifap.gob.mx
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.
