Effect of irrigation, fertilization and the container on the response to grafting of Pinus patula Schltdl. & Cham. seedlings

Authors

  • Edgar David López Avendaño Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en Ciencias Forestales, Campus Montecillo
  • Miguel Angel López López Colegio de Postgraduados , Montecillo
  • Carlos Ramírez Herrera Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en Ciencias Forestales, Campus Montecillo
  • Manuel Aguilera Rodríguez Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en Ciencias Forestales, Campus Montecillo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v14i75.1255

Keywords:

Fertilizante de liberación lenta, injerto, planta patrón, prendimiento, reproducción asexual, riego a saturación

Abstract

Grafting success depends on multiple factors, including species-dependent ones. However, there are few studies on the effects of management of rootstock and the composite (grafted) Pinus patula, seedlings on graft performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the grafting success and development of P. patula shoot grafts based on factors associated with management of both the rootstock and the composite (grafted) plant. In a 2x2x2 factorial experiment, the rootstocks were subjected to two types of container, two levels of irrigation and two levels of fertilization one month before grafting, which went on with the treatments until the end of the experimental period. Grafting success (PI), graft basal diameter (DBI), graft length (LI), graft robustness index (IR), graft basal diameter increase (IDBI) and graft length increase (ILI) were evaluated. Mann-Whitney tests and analyses of variance followed by Tukey tests (α=0.05) were applied. The factors tested did not affect statistically or directly PI, whose general mean value was 72.5 %. The container type and levels of watering and fertilization significantly affected all the assessed morphological variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnett, J. R. and H. Miller. 1994. The effect of applied heat on graft union formation in dormant Picea sitchensis (Bong.) carr. Journal of Experimental Botany 45(1):135-143. Doi: 10.1093/jxb/45.1.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/45.1.135

Barrera-Ramírez, R., J. J. Vargas-Hernández, R. López-Aguillón, H. J. Muñoz-Flores, E. J. Treviño-Garza and O. A. Aguirre-Calderón. 2021. Impact of external and internal factors on successful grafting of Pinus pseudostrobus var. oaxacana (Mirov) Harrison. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 27(2):243-256. Doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.05.037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.05.037

Berrington de G., A. and D. R. Cox. 2007. Interpretation of interactions: a review. The Annals of Applied Statistics 1(2):371-385. Doi: 10.1214/07-AOAS124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS124

Camcore. 2008. ¿Estamos más cerca de entender la ascendencia de las poblaciones de “la variante Patula” en la Sierra Madre del Sur? Boletín de noticias Camcore para México y Centroamérica 2(2):1. https://camcore.cnr.ncsu.edu/files/2015/04/boletincamcore2008_2abril.pdf. (27 de abril de 2022).

Cañellas, I., L. Finat, A. Bachiller y G. Montero. 1999. Comportamiento de planta de Pinus pinea en vivero y campo: ensayos de técnicas de cultivo de planta, fertilización y aplicación de herbicidas. Investigación Agraria, Producción y Protección Vegetales 8(2):335-359. https://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/619/616. (14 de diciembre de 2021).

Castro-Garibay, S. L., A. Aldrete; J. López-Upton y V. M. Ordáz-Chaparro. 2018. Efecto del envase, sustrato y fertilización en el crecimiento de Pinus greggii var. australis en vivero. Agrociencia 52(1):115–127. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/agro/v52n1/1405-3195-agro-52-01-115.pdf. (14 de octubre de 2021).

Copes, D. L. 1980. Effect of rootstock vigor on leader elongation, branch growth, and plagiotropism in 4- and 8-year-old Douglas-fir grafts. Tree Planters' Notes 31(1):11-14. https://rngr.net/publications/tpn/31-1/31_1_11_14.pdf. (12 de febrero de 2022).

Dabirian, S. and C. A. Miles. 2017. Increasing survival of splice-grafted watermenlon seedlings using a sucrose application. HortScience 52(4):579-583. Doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI11667-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11667-16

Darikova, Y. A., E. A. Vaganov, G. V. Kuznetsova and A. M. Grachev. 2013. Changes in the anatomical structure of tree rings of the rootstock and scion in the heterografts of Siberian pine. Trees 27:1621-1631. Doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0909-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-013-0909-6

Dvorak, W. S. 2002. Pinus patula Schiede & Schltdl. & Cham. In: Vozzo, J. A. (edit.). Tropical tree seed manual. Agricultural Handbook 721. United State Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, DC, USA. pp. 632-635.

Farjon, A. and B. T. Styles. 1997. Pinus (pinacea). Flora Neotropica, Monograph 75. Organization for Flora Neotropica and New York Botanical Garden. New York, NY, USA. 293 p.

Goldschmidt, E. E. 2014. Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:1-9. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00727

González-Jiménez, B., M. Jiménez-Casas, J. López-Upton, M. Á. López-López and R. Rodríguez-Laguna. 2022. Combination of grafting techniques to clone superior genotypes of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. et Cham. Agrociencia 56(5):993-1017. Doi: 10.47163/agrociencia.v56i5.2582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v56i5.2582

Hibbert-Frey, H., J. Frampton, F. A. Blazich, D. Hundley and L. E. Hinesley. 2011. Grafting fraser fir (Abies fraseri): Effect of scion origin (crown position and branch order). HortScience 46(1):91-94. Doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.1.91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.1.91

Hildebrant, T. 2017. Conifer propagation. American Conifer Society. https://conifersociety.org/conifers/articles/conifer-propagation-101/. (21 de febrero de 2022).

Jayawickrama, K. J. S., J. B. Jett and S. E. McKeand. 1991. Rootstock effects in grafted conifers: A review. New Forest 5:157–173. Doi: 10.1007/BF00029306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029306

Kita, K., H. Kon, W. Ishizuka, E. Agathokleous and M. Kuromaru. 2018. Survival rate and shoot growth of grafted Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii var. japonica): a comparison between Japanese larch (L. kaempferi) and F1 hybrid larch (L. gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi) rootstocks. Silvae Genetic 67(1):111–116. Doi: 10.2478/sg-2018-0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2018-0016

Landis, T. D., R. W. Tinus, S. E. McDonald and J. P. Barnett. 1989. The container tree nursery manual. Seedling nutrition and irrigation. Vol. 4. Agriculture Handbook. 674. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Wahington, DC, USA. 119 p.

Landis, T. D. Containers: Types an functions. In: Landis, T. D., R. W. Tinus, S. E. McDonald and J. P. Barnett. 1990. The container tree nursery manual. Containers and growing media. Vol. 2. Agriculture Handbook 674. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1-39.

López L., J. Á. 2020. Manejo de un huerto semillero y banco clonal de Pinus douglasiana Martínez en Jalisco. Fideicomiso para la Administración del Programa de Desarrollo Forestal del Estado de Jalisco (Fiprodefo). Guadalajara, Jal., México. 210 p.

Lott, L. H., L. M. Lott, M. Stine, T. L. Kubisiak and C. D. Nelson. 2003. Top grafting longleaf × slash pine F1 hybrids on mature longleaf and slash pine interstocks. In: Tree Improvement and Genetics-27th Sothern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Oklahoma State University. Oklahoma, OK, USA. pp. 96–101.

Moore, R. 1984. A model for graft compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. American Journal of Botany 71(5):752–758. Doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb14182.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb14182.x

Mudge., K., J. Janick, S. Scofield and E. E. Goldschmidt. 2009. A history of grafting. Horticultural Reviews 35:437-493. Doi: 10.1002/9780470593776.ch9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470593776.ch9

Muñoz F., H. J., G. Orozco G., V. M. Coria A., R. Toledo B. y H. Aguilar G. 2011. Validación de dos métodos de injerto de Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl., en Michoacán. Folleto técnico Núm. 24. INIFAP-Campo Experimental Uruapan. Uruapan, Mich., México. 43 p.

Muñoz F., H. J., J. Á. Prieto R., A. Flores G., T. Pineda O. y E. Morales G. 2013. Técnicas de injertado "enchapado lateral" y "fisura terminal" en Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl. Folleto técnico Núm. 68. INIFAP-Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana. Durango, Dgo., México. 48 p.

Mutabaruka, C., H. F. Cook and G. P. Buckley. 2015. Effects of drought and nutrient deficiency on grafts originating from sound and shaken sweet chestnut trees (Castanea sativa Mill.). iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 9(1):109-114. Doi: 10.3832/ifor1572-008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1572-008

Pérez-Luna, A., J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz, J. López-Upton, A. Carrillo-Parra, … and J. C. Hernández-Díaz. 2019. Some factors involved in the success of side veneer grafting of Pinus engelmannii Carr. Forests 10(2):112-129. Doi: 10.3390/f10020112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020112

Pérez-Luna, A., C. Wehenkel, J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz, J. López-Upton, … and J. C. Hernández-Díaz. 2020. Grafting in conifers: A review. Pakistan Journal of Botany 52(4):1369–1378. Doi: 10.30848/PJB2020-4(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2020-4(10)

Pérez-Luna, A., J. C. Hernández-Díaz, C. Wehenkel, S. L. Simental-Rodríguez, J. Hernández-Velasco and J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz. 2021. Graft survival of Pinus engelmannii Carr. in relation to two grafting techniques with dormant and sprouting buds. PeerJ 9:e12182. Doi: 10.7717/peerj.12182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12182

Perry, J. P. 1991. The pines of Mexico and Central American. Timber Press. Austin, TX, USA. 231 p.

Pershey, N. A. 2014. Reducing water use, runoff volume, and nutrient movement for container nursery production by scheduling irrigation based on plant daily water use. Master of Science Thesis, Horticulture, Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI, USA. 151 p.

Pina, A. and P. Errea. 2005. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility–incompatibility. Scientia Horticulturae 106(1):1–11. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003

Ranjith, K. and R. V. J. Ilango. 2017. Impact of grafting methods, scion materials and number of scions on graft success, vigour and flowering of top worked plants in tea (Camellia spp.). Scientia Horticulturae 220:139–146. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.039

Rivera-Rodríguez, M. O., J. J. Vargas-Hernández, J. López-Upton, Á. Villegas-Monter y M. Jiménez-Casas. 2016. Enraizamiento de estacas de Pinus patula. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 39(4):385-392. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rfm/v39n4/0187-7380-rfm-39-04-00385.pdf. (22 de abril de 2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2016.4.385-392

Sáenz R., J. T., H. J. Muñoz F., C. M. Á. Pérez D., A. Rueda S. y J. Hernández R. 2014. Calidad de planta de tres especies de pino en el vivero "Morelia", estado de Michoacán. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 5(26):98-111. Doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v5i26.293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v5i26.293

Statical Analysis System (SAS). 2002. SAS 9.0. Cary, NC, USA. SAS Institute.

Valdés, A. E., M. L. Centeno and B. Fernández. 2003. Changes in the branching pattern of Pinus radiata derived from grafting are supported by variations in the hormonal content. Plant Science 165(6):1397-1401. Doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.08.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.08.003

Vargas-Hernández, J. J. and J. I. Vargas-Abonce. 2016. Effect of giberellic acid (GA4/7) and girdling on induction of reproductive structures in Pinus patula. Forest

Systems 25(2):e063. Doi: 10.5424/fs/2016252-09254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2016252-09254

Velázquez M., A., Á. Pérez y G. Llanderal O. 2004. Monografía de Pinus patula. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Semarnat), Comisión Nacional Forestal (Conafor) y Colegio de Postgraduados (Colpos). Coyoacán, D. F., México 124 p.

Verdugo-Vázquez, N., G. Gutiérrez-Gamboa, I. Díaz-Gálvez, A. Ibacache and A. Zurita-Silva. 2021. Modifications induced by rootstocks on yield, vigor and nutritional status on Vitis vinifera Cv Syrah under hyper-arid conditions in Northern Chile. Agronomy 11(5):979-983. Doi: 10.3390/agronomy11050979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050979

Villaseñor, R. R. y M. V. S. Carrera G. 1980. Tres ensayos de injertado en Pinus patula Schl. et Cham. Ciencia Forestal en México 5(23):21-36.

Wang, Y. 2011. Plant grafting and its application in biological research. Chinese Science Bulletin 56(33):3511–3517. Doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4816-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4816-1

Wright, J. W. 1976. Introduction to Forest Genetics. Academic Press, Inc. Los Ángeles, CA, USA. 463 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-765250-4.50005-8

Yin, H., B. Yan, J. Sun, P. Jia, … H. Liu. 2012. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 63(11):4219-4232. Doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers109

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

López Avendaño, Edgar David, Miguel Angel López López, Carlos Ramírez Herrera, and Manuel Aguilera Rodríguez. 2022. “Effect of Irrigation, Fertilization and the Container on the Response to Grafting of Pinus Patula Schltdl. & Cham. Seedlings”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Forestales 14 (75). México, ME:118-42. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v14i75.1255.

Issue

Section

Scientific article