Optimal sampling strategy for timber inventory planning in commercial plantations of Tectona grandis L.f.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v12i68.1074

Keywords:

Sampling estimators, stratification by age class, forest inventory, Tectona grandis L. f., sample size, auxiliary variables., Sampling, estimators, stratification, forest, inventory, sample, size, teak, auxiliary, variables

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the statistical efficiency of six sampling estimators to propose an optimal sampling strategy in terms of precision and time that allows conducting operational timber inventories that support decision-making aimed at improving the technical management of commercial forest teak plantations (Tectona grandis) established in Campeche, Mexico. Data used were from 8 830 sampling sites of a planted area of 2 207.5 hectares. Each sampling site was rectangular of seventy-two m2 included nine stocks, the number of living trees was counted and their diameter at breast height was measured. The total height and volume of each tree were estimated with Chapman-Richards and Schumacher-Hall models, respectively. Basimetric area and total volume per site were obtained and extrapolated at hectare. Plantations were stratified by age classes; the basimetric area and the age of the plantation were used as auxiliary variables. The sampling strategy to estimate the mean volume was formed by associating simple random sampling as the sampling design with the specific ratio estimator in stratified sampling, with a stratification by age classes of one year and basimetric area as auxiliary variable; this gave the accuracy of 0.21 %. The sample size in stratified sampling could be reduced to 68.3 % with an accuracy of 2.5 % of the original sample. This means less sampling effort and economies by reducing the time for forest inventory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hector Manuel De los Santos Posadas, Postgrado Forestal, Colegio de Postgraduados

Héctor M. De los Santos Posadas

Profesor Investigador Titular en

Biometría y Manejo Forestal

References

Adichwal, N. K., P. Sharma, Y. R. Singh, and R. Singh. 2019. A class of estimators for population mean utilizing information on auxiliary variables using two phase sampling schemes in the presence of non-response when study variable is an attribute. Pakistan Journal of Statistics 35(3): 187-196. http://www.pakjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/35301.pdf (23 de diciembre de 2020).

Breña P., A. F. 2004. Precipitación y recursos hidráulicos en México. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. México, D. F: https://uamenlinea.uam.mx/materiales/licenciatura/hidrologia/precipitacion/PRHM04-libro.pdf (25 de mayo de 2020).

Cochran, W. G. 1993. Técnicas de muestreo. Compañía Editorial Continental. México, D. F., México. 513 p.

Corona, P. and L. Fattorini. 2006. The assessment of tree row attributes by stratified two-stage sampling. European Journal of Forest Research 125(1): 57-66. Doi:10.1007/s10342-005-0078-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-005-0078-2

Fattorini, L., P. Corona, G. Chirici and M. C. Pagliarella. 2015. Design-based strategies for sampling spatial units from regular grids with applications to forest surveys, land use, and land cover estimation. Environmetrics 26(3): 216-228. Doi:10.1002/env.2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2332

Fierros M., R., H. M. De los Santos P., A. M. Fierros G., F. Cruz C., L. Martínez Á., E. Velasco B. y G. Quiñonez B. 2018. Estimadores de muestreo para inventario de plantaciones de Pinus chiapensis (Martínez) Andresen. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 9(47): 131-148. Doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v9i47.155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v9i47.155

Freese, F. 1976. Elementary forest sampling. USDA FS Agriculture Handbook Num. 232. Washington, DC, USA. 91 p.

Grafström, A., S. Saarela and L. T. Ene. 2014. Efficient sampling strategies for forest inventories by spreading the sample in auxiliary space. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44(10): 1156-1164. Doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0202

Gregoire, T. G. and T. H. Valentine. 2008. Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Boca Raton, FL, USA. 474 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203498880

Köhl, M. and S. Magnussen. 2016. Sampling in forest inventories. In: Pancel, L. and Köhl M. (eds). Tropical Forestry Handbook. Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 777-837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_72

Köhl, M., A. Lister, C. T. Scott, T. Baldauf and D. Plugge. 2011. Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems. Carbon Balance and Management 6(1): 10. Doi:10.1186/1750-0680-6-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-10

Lencinas, J. D. y D. Mohr-Bell. 2007. Estimación de clases de edad de las plantaciones de la provincia de Corrientes, Argentina, con base en datos satelitales Landsat. Bosque 28(2): 106-118. Doi:10.4067/S0717-92002007000200003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002007000200003

Marchi, M., C. Ferrara, G. Bertini, S. Fares and L. Salvati. 2017. A sampling design strategy to reduce survey costs in forest monitoring. Ecological Indicators 81: 182-191. Doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.011

Pérez, L. C. 2005. Muestreo estadístico. Conceptos y problemas resueltos. Pearson Prentice Hall. Madrid, España. 374 p.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/ (28 de febrero de 2020).

Raj, D. 1980. Teoría del muestreo. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México, D. F., México. 305 p.

Roldán, C. M. A., H. M. De los Santos P., H. Ramírez M., J. R. Valdez L., G. Ángeles P. y A. Velázquez M. 2014. Estimadores de muestreo para inventario de plantaciones forestales comerciales de eucalipto en el sureste Mexicano. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 5(26): 38-56. Doi:10.29298/rmcf.v5i26.289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v5i26.289

Scheaffer, R. L., W. Mendenhall y L. Ott. 1987. Elementos de muestreo. Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica. México, D. F., México. 321 p.

Schreuder, H. T., G. T. Gregoire and G. B. Wood. 1993. Sampling methods for multiresource forest inventory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA. 446 p.

Schreuder, H. T., R. Ernst and H. Ramírez M. 2004. Statistical techniques for sampling and monitoring natural resources. USDA F S. General Technical Report Num. 126. Fort Collins, CO, USA. 111 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-126

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Semarnat). 2008. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-152-SEMARNAT-2006, Que establece los lineamientos, criterios y especificaciones de los contenidos de los programas de manejo forestal para el aprovechamiento de recursos forestales maderables en bosques, selvas y vegetación de zonas áridas. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Secretaría de Gobernación. México, D. F., México. http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5064731&fecha=17/10/2008 (2 de abril de 2021).

Shiver, B. D. and E. B. Borders. 1996. Sampling techniques for forest resources inventory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA. 356 p.

Tamarit U., J. C. 2013. Cubicación, crecimiento y rendimiento maderable e inventario operativo para Tectona grandis en el Sureste de México. Tesis Doctoral. Programa Forestal. Colegio de Postgraduados. Texcoco, Edo. de Méx., México. 97 p.

Tamarit U., J. C., H. M. De los Santos P., A. Aldrete, J. R. Valdez L., H. Ramírez M. y V. Guerra D. 2014. Sistema de cubicación para árboles individuales de Tectona grandis L. f. mediante funciones compatibles de ahusamiento-volumen. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 5(21): 58-74. Doi:10.29298/rmcf.v5i21.358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v5i21.358

Tamarit U., J. C., H. M. De los Santos P., A. Aldrete, J. R. Valdez L., H. Ramírez M. y V. Guerra D. 2019. Sistema de crecimiento y rendimiento maderable para plantaciones de teca (Tectona grandis L. f.) en Campeche, México. Madera y Bosques 25(3):e2531908. Doi:10.21829/myb.2019.2531908.

Vallée, A. A., F. R. Bastien, L. P. Rivest and Y. Tillé. 2015. Incorporating spatial and operational constraints in the sampling designs for forest inventories. Environmetrics 26(8): 557-570. Doi:10.1002/env.2366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2366

van Laar, A. and A. Akça. 2007. Forest mensuration. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 383 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5991-9

Velasco B., E., H. Ramírez M., F. Moreno S. y A. de la Rosa V. 2003. Estimadores de razón para el inventario nacional forestal de México. Ciencia Forestal en México 28(94): 23-43. https://cienciasforestales.inifap.gob.mx/editorial/index.php/forestales/article/view/882/2145 (4 de mayo de 2020).

West, P. W. 2017. Simulation studies to examine bias and precision of some estimators that use auxiliary information in design-based sampling in forest inventory. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 47: 22. Doi:10.1186/s40490-017-0101-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40490-017-0101-7

Published

2021-11-05

How to Cite

Urias, Juan Carlos Tamarit, Hector Manuel De los Santos Posadas, Arnulfo Aldrete, Jose René Valdez Lazalde, Hugo Ramirez Maldonado, and Vidal Guerra De la Cruz. 2021. “F”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Forestales 12 (68). México, ME:58-80. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v12i68.1074.

Issue

Section

Scientific article