Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales Vol. 15 (82)

Marzo - Abril (2024)

Logotipo, nombre de la empresa

Descripción generada automáticamente

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v15i82.1452

Research article

 

Servicios ambientales de la vegetación arbórea de los parques de Texcoco de Mora, Estado de México

Environmental services of tree vegetation of the parks of Texcoco de Mora, State of Mexico

 

Miguel Mancilla Morales1, Leopoldo Mohedano Caballero1, Ro Linx Granados Victorino2, Diódoro Granados Sánchez1*, Alejandro Corona Ambriz1

 

Fecha de recepción/Reception date: 31 de octubre de 2023.

Fecha de aceptación/Acceptance date: 7 de febrero de 2024.

_______________________________

1Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, División de Ciencias Forestales. México.

2Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Preparatoria Agrícola. México.

 

*Autor para correspondencia; correo-e: didorog@hotmail.com

*Corresponding author; e-mail: didorog@hotmail.com

 

Abstract

Urban trees play an important role within cities due to the environmental services they provide and their contribution to mitigating the current climate crisis. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the tree vegetation of five public parks in the Texcoco de Mora municipality in order to estimate the environmental services they provide. A census was carried out per park and the data were processed through the i-Tree® Eco v6 software. 1 325 individuals from 23 families and 37 genera were recorded with a richness of 55 species in the five parks, an average density of 157 trees ha-1 and a total of 242.6 megagrams of carbon storage with a carbon capture of 10.5 Mg year-1. The avoided rain runoff was 481 m3 year-1 and the value represented by these environmental services is MXN $894 514.93 for carbon storage, MXN $38 650 annually for carbon capture, and MXN $481.93 for runoff. The replacement value of the trees reaches MXN $24 408 534. A tree cover of 30 485 m2 was estimated, which represents a factor of 0.86 m2 inhabitant-1. It is concluded that Texcoco is below the recommended factor of trees per inhabitant proposed by the UN. It is necessary to study the green areas, medians, alignment trees and community parks, to achieve a more complete panorama of the municipality.

Key words: Urban trees, quality of life, climate change, carbon sequestration, green infrastructure, i-Tree®.

Resumen

El arbolado urbano desempeña un papel importante dentro de las ciudades por los servicios ambientales que provee y por su contribución a la mitigación de la actual crisis climática. En ese contexto, el objetivo del presente estudio consistió en evaluar la vegetación arbórea de cinco parques públicos del municipio Texcoco de Mora a fin de estimar los servicios ambientales que proporcionan. Se realizó un censo por parque y se procesaron los datos a través del software i-Tree® Eco V6. Se registraron 1 325 individuos de 23 familias y 37 géneros con una riqueza de 55 especies en los cinco parques, una densidad promedio de 157 árboles ha-1 y un total de 242.6 megagramos de almacenamiento de carbono con una captura de 10.5 Mg año-1. El escurrimiento de lluvia evitado fue de 481 m3 año-1 y el valor que representan estos servicios ambientales en pesos es de MXN $894 514.93 para el almacenamiento de carbono, MXN $38 650 anuales para la captura del mismo y MXN $481.93 para el escurrimiento. El valor de sustitución del arbolado es de MXN $24 408 534.00. Se estimó una cobertura arbórea de 30 485 m2, lo cual representa un factor de 0.86 m2 habitante-1. Se concluye que Texcoco está por debajo del factor recomendado de arbolado por habitante propuesto por la ONU. Es necesario estudiar las áreas verdes, camellones, árboles de alineamiento y parques comunitarios para tener un panorama del municipio más completo.

Palabras clave: Árboles urbanos, calidad de vida, cambio climático, captura de carbono, infraestructura verde, i-Tree®.

 

 

Introduction

 

 

In the current context of climate change and the growing human population, trees in cities play a crucial role in providing vital environmental services for society and the planet (IPCC, 2022); they improve air quality, help mitigate the effects of the heat island, capture rainwater that helps recharge aquifers, serve as social gathering centers, are references for neighborhoods and communities and, in addition, contribute positively to the mental health of visitors (Martínez-Soto et al., 2016; Herrera and Romo, 2021).

Climate change, largely caused by greenhouse gas emissions, has led to an increase in global temperature, mainly within cities, as well as changes in precipitation patterns (Bárcena et al., 2020). In this scenario, trees serve as carbon reservoirs, absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and by storing it in their biomass and soils. In addition, they act as regulators of the local climate through shade, reducing room temperature and reducing energy demand for cooling in densely populated urban areas (FAO, 2022).

Overpopulation, on the other hand, generates a series of challenges in terms of limited resources, increased demand for food, energy and living space (Zamora, 2015). Trees help mitigate these problems by providing key ecosystem services. For example, fruit and forest trees can help meet the demand for food and timber resources, while improving the quality of life of communities by providing green and recreational spaces (Sader, 2020).

In this perspective, understanding and valuing trees and the environmental services they provide becomes essential to address the challenges of climate change and overpopulation. This involves the conservation and restoration of green areas in the city, as well as the implementation of reforestation and agroforestry strategies in urban and rural areas (ONUAA, 2021). In addition, it is necessary to promote sustainable management of forest resources and the adoption of policies that encourage the protection and expansion of urban tree ecosystems (Bárcena et al., 2020). Implementing these actions will prepare cities to face future environmental challenges, social disparities and food security (Giannotti et al., 2020).

To quantify the services that trees provide, there are several methods, however, one of the tools that has recently been used for its usefulness and efficiency is the i-Tree® Eco software (De la Concha, 2018). This instrument allows a more efficient evaluation of urban areas, whether small or large, that have trees. The results obtained through this evaluation help to manage and improve decision-making in these areas effectively (i-Tree, 2021).

In this work, the benefits of the environmental services provided by the trees of different parks in Texcoco, State of Mexico, were quantified and evaluated due to the importance of their conservation and maintenance to maximize the benefits and thus the quality of life of the inhabitants. Additionally, the performance of the i-Tree® Eco V6 software is evaluated for data collection and analysis of the current investigation.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

 

Study area

 

 

The study was carried out in the Texcoco de Mora municipality, State of Mexico, whose surface area is 6 212.17 km2 and has 35 491 inhabitants according to Inegi (2021). The trees were analyzed in the five most visited parks in the municipality that have 14.41 ha: (a) Niños Héroes Parkwith 1 600 m2 (19°30'32.53" N, 98°52'32.57" W), (b) Municipal Garden Park with 9 000 m2 (19°30'51.56" N, 98°52'56.04" W), (c) Elderly Age Park with 9 100 m2 (19°30'37.55" N, 98°53'6.67" W); (d) Alameda de Texcoco Parkwith 42 950 m2 (19°31'8.56" N, 98°52'31.99" W), and (e) Silverio Pérez Sports Park with 81 500 m2 (19°31'16.80" N, 98°53'4.37" W) (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Location map of the five censused parks in Texcoco de Mora, State of Mexico, Mexico.

 

 

Urban tree census

 

 

An urban tree census was carried out based on the VTA (Visual Tree Assessment) method proposed by the ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) (Calaza and Iglesias, 2016). To record the data, the i-Tree® manual (i-Tree, 2021) was followed based on the location, identifier number and species of each individual counted in each of the parks.

To estimate the height of the trees, a software for high-end mobile devices called Arboreal®-Height of tree was used, which works with augmented reality (AR) technology to measure the distance from the tree to the device and subsequently take the angles and distance to the top (apex of the crown) and bottom of the tree (base of the trunk) and with these data estimate the total height of the tree. In the same way, the height of the clean stem and the height of the clean crown were obtained (Arboreal, 2023).

For the diameter, a flexible synthetic fabric diameter 320 cm/10m 283D Forestry Supplier® diameter tape was used. For the crown diameter, a long flexible 50 m TP50ME Trupper® tape was used. For each individual, the diameter of the crown was taken in the North-South direction and East-West, information that was subsequently averaged.

For the health condition of the crown, the proportion in healthy or present percentage of the crown was recorded, based on the i-Tree® manual (i-Tree, 2021).

 

 

Population density

 

 

The relationship between the number of people living in the Texcoco de Mora city (35 491 inhabitants) and the extent of the space they live in (6 212.17 km2) was determined to obtain the population density per square kilometer within the urban area (Inegi, 2022).

 

 

Green space factor per inhabitant

 

 

The relationship between the area (km2) of the tree cover of the five parks evaluated and the extension (km2) of the City of Texcoco de Mora was calculated, to obtain the green space factor per inhabitant (ONU, 2015).

 

 

Data analysis

 

 

Data were captured in i-Tree® Eco V6 software (i-Tree, 2021) through the use of a mobile device and were finally processed into one project per park, based on the reference data.

They are mentioned below, since they are mandatory so that each project can be executed and analyzed within the i-Tree® Eco V6 software (i-Tree, 2021). Information from the mobile weather station Lic. Benito Juárez Intl. with ID: 766793-99999 was used, with weather data from 2020 (most recent year in the software). For the economic valuation, the price of the ton of carbon stored and captured that was used was MXN $3 687.66 ton-1, according to market values (i-Tree, 2021). The value of the avoided runoff used was $44.90 MXN/m3; because there is no runoff evaluation for Mexico, the national average value for the United States was used and converted to local currency (i-Tree, 2021).

Only trees greater than 2 m in height and diameter >3 cm were taken into account; and specimens whose crown height was less than their clean stem height were excluded before performing the analysis in the i-Tree® Eco software, since the program does not recognize individuals with these characteristics. The tree census was carried out from August 2022 to February 2023.

 

 

Results

 

 

In the five parks evaluated, 1 477 trees were censused, however, after excluding those that cannot be processed by the i-Tree® Eco software, 1 325 individuals were analyzed. 55 tree species belonging to 23 families and 37 genera were recorded (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Composition of tree species in the five censused parks in Texcoco de Mora, State of Mexico, Mexico.

Species

Common name

Origin

Abundance

Acacia baileyana F. Muell.

Acacia azul

New south Wales

5

Acacia melanoxylon R. Br.

Acacia negra

Australia

35

Acacia retinodes Schtldl.

Acacia

Australia

4

Alnus acuminata Kunth

Aile

South America

4

Araucaria columnaris (J. R. Forst.) Hook.

Araucaria

New Caledonia

6

Bauhinia divaricata L.

Pata de vaca

American continent

14

Casuarina equisetifolia L.

Casuarina

Australia

100

Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck

Naranjo

Asia

1

Cupressus arizonica Greene

Cedro

Mexico

37

Cupressus lusitanica Mill.

Cedro blanco

Mexico

29

Cupressus macrocarpa Hartw. ex Gordon

Cedro limón

United States of America

95

Cupressus sempervirens L.

Ciprés panteonero

Mediterranean region

77

Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.

Níspero

Asia

2

Erythrina coralloides DC.

Colorín

Mexico

1

Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.

Eucalipto

Australia

194

Eucalyptus cinerea F. Muell. ex Benth.

Eucalipto dólar

Australia

1

Euphorbia cotinifolia L.

Sangre de Líbano

South America

3

Ficus benjamina L.

Ficus

India

103

Ficus microcarpa L. f.

Laurel de la india

Asia

78

Fraxinus uhdei (Wenz.) Lingelsh.

Fresno

Mexico

133

Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. ex R. Br.

Grevillea

Australia

12

Hibiscus tiliaceus L.

Tulipán

Hawai

18

Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don

Jacaranda

South America

97

Larix spp.

Alerce

North America

5

Leucaena esculenta (DC.) Benth.

Guaje rojo

Mexico

3

Ligustrum lucidum W. T. Aiton

Trueno

Asia

58

Liquidambar styraciflua L.

Liquidambar

Mexico

7

Magnolia mexicana DC.

Magnolia

Mexico

6

Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh.

Manzano

Asia

2

Olea europaea L.

Olivo

Europa

6

Persea americana Mill.

Aguacate

Mesoamerica

1

Phoenix canariensis Wildpret

Palma canaria

Africa

25

Pinus cembroides Zucc.

Pino piñonero

Mexico

3

Pinus greggii Engelm. ex Parl.

Pino greggi

Mexico

2

Pinus leiophylla Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham.

Pino leiophylla

Mexico

1

Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham.

Pino patula

Mexico

2

Pinus pinceana Gordon & Glend.

Pino piñonero llorón

Mexico

1

Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl.

Ocote blanco

Mexico

1

Pinus radiata D. Don.

Pino radiata

California

3

Pinus spp.

Pino

Mexico

8

Pinus teocote Schltdl. & Cham.

Pino teocote

Mexico

1

Platanus mexicana Moric.

Platanus

Mexico

2

Populus alba L.

Álamo blanco

Asia

103

Populus nigra L.

Álamo negro

Europa

1

Prunus domestica L.

Ciruelo

Asia

1

Prunus persica (L.) Batsch

Durazno

Asia

19

Prunus serotina Ehrh.

Capulín

Mexico

2

Quercus virginiana Mill.

Encino blanco

North America

3

Roystonea regia (Kunth) O. F. Cook

Palma real

Asia

32

Salix bonplandiana Kunth

Ahuejote

Mexico

1

Schinus molle L.

Pirul

Peru

85

Senna multiglandulosa (Jacq.) H. S. Irwin & Barneby

Retama

Mexico

14

Spathodea campanulata P. Beauv.

Tulipán africano

Africa

4

Taxodium mucronatum Ten.

Ahuehuete

Mexico

16

Washingtonia filifera (Gloner ex Kerch., Burv., Pynaert, Rodigas & Hull) de Bary

Palma washingtonia

California

9

 

The abundance of the species in each park was estimated and it turned out that only six species of the 55 recorded amount for 49.25 % of the total number of individuals in the parks, which means that even with a high species richness, there is no equity in the abundance. Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. (13.13 % of the total abundance) tops the list of the most abundant species, followed by Fraxinus uhdei (Wenz.) Lingelsh. (9 %), Populus alba L. (6.97 %), Ficus benjamina L. (6.97 %), Casuarina equisetifolia L. (6.7 %) and Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don. (6.56 %). Only those six species make up almost 50 % of the total number of recorded individuals. It was estimated that 82.89 % of the individuals are exotic.

The Niños Héroes Park, despite being the park with the smallest surface area (1 600 m2), has the highest tree density compared to the others (256.3 individuals ha-1). Due to the average diameter and height of its trees, the Silverio Pérez Sports Park has the highest values for storage (242.6 Mg) and carbon capture (10.5 Mg year-1), as well as for avoided runoff (481.9 m3 year-1) (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Area, tree density, tree cover and environmental services provided by the five studied parks in Texcoco de Mora, State of Mexico, Mexico.

Location

Area (m²)

Density (trees ha-1)

Number of trees

Tree cover (m²)

Carbon storage (Mg)

Gross carbon capture (Mg yr-1)

Avoided runoff (m3 yr-1)

Niños Héroes Park

1 600

256.3

41

938

8.26

0.35

13.84

Municipal Garden Park

9 000

168.9

152

4 692

29.21

1.00

40.15

Elderly Age Park

9 100

194.5

177

4 304.5

22.41

0.56

71.76

Alameda de Texcoco Park

42 950

111.3

478

4 173.7

22.65

2.10

33.50

Silverio Pérez Sports Park

81 500

58.5

477

16 377

160.05

6.47

322.68

Total

144 150

157.9

1 325

30 485.2

242.6

10.5

481.9

 

The tree cover was estimated in m2 for each park, obtaining that the Niños Héroes Park has 58.6 % of its surface covered by canopy, 47.3 % of its surface for the Elderly Age Park, 52 % for the Municipal Garden Park, 20.1 % for the Silverio Pérez Sports Park, and finally 9.7 % for the Alameda de Texcoco Park. Like the density of trees, the Niños Héroes Park is the assessed area that has the greatest vegetation cover in relation to its extension.

With the value of the tree cover of the five censused parks (30.48 km2) and the surface area that includes Texcoco de Mora city (6 212.17 km2), the green space factor per inhabitant was estimated, which resulted in the contribution of these areas for the population of Texcoco is 0.86 m2 per inhabitant.

Li et al. (2015), Seiferling et al.(2017) and Lüttge and Buckeridge (2020), took as reference a computational analysis based on the Google® Street view to calculate a green view index for each city, which yields the percentage of vegetation cover with respect to the total population per km2. When comparing data from 27 cities around the world, it can be seen that the trend is that tree cover increases as population density decreases. If the software does not have data from Texcoco and if there are few published works on tree cover (Martínez-Trinidad et al., 2021; Hernández-López et al., 2023), the data generated for this work are the closest to what is locally known about its green areas; therefore, contrasting it with other cities around the world offers a perspective of the reality of such data in the municipality (Figure 2).

 

Source: Own modification, taken from Lüttge and Buckeridge (2020).

Figure 2. Comparison between the percentage of tree cover and population density per km2 in 27 cities.

 

As can be seen, Texcoco de Mora city turns out to be positioned in a place not close to the trend line, so it could be considered an atypical city. Because only the tree cover of the five parks was considered, the relationship in terms of the surface of the city is 0.49 % of green cover, and the population density was estimated at 5.7 inhabitants per Km2.

The values in Mexican pesos that the services provided by urban trees in the parks of Texcoco would have annually were estimated, in order to justify better management and maintenance. Regarding the value of carbon storage, Silverio Pérez Sports Park obtained the best value with MXN $590 204.05 because its trees are mature and have the highest average diameters and heights recorded (34.6 cm and 11 m). In the same way, it records the highest carbon capture estimated at MXN $23 862.06 annually, and also the avoided runoff with MXN $322.68 (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Value in Mexican pesos that represents the environmental services provided by the five studied parks.

Location

Value in Mexican pesos of carbon storage (Mg)

Value in Mexican pesos of carbon capture (Mg year-1)

Value in Mexican pesos of avoided runoff (m3 year-1)

Replacement value (MXN)

Niños Héroes Park

83 509.08

7 728.95

33.5

4 603 802.51

Municipal Garden Park

30 454.54

1 285.44

13.84

961 314.47

Elderly Age Park

107 713.61

3 697.71

40.15

3 679 594.48

Silverio Pérez Sports Park

590 204.05

23 862.06

322.68

11 836 976.69

Alameda de Texcoco Park

82 633.65

2 076.57

71.76

3 326 845.86

Total

894 514.93

38 650.73

481.93

24 408 534.01

 

A total value of 242.6 Mg was obtained for carbon storage estimated at MXN $894 514.93 and a value of 10.5 Mg per year for carbon capture estimated at MXN $38 650.73 per year. The runoff avoided by the trees in the five parks was 481.9 m3 annually, estimated at MXN $481.93. According to the estimated values of the annual services and the replacement value, or the value that the parks have with the conditions of the current trees, they add up to MXN $24 408 534.01.

 

 

Discussion

 

 

The loss of biological diversity constitutes a global environmental problem that humanity must solve (Almaguer, 2006), and one of the main problems it faces is the presence of introduced species (Badii et al., 2015). In Texcoco, 82.89 % of the tree species present in the evaluated parks are of this type, which warrants immediate measures for their management. The most worrying problems of ignoring this bioindicator are the damage to human health and economic well-being, the functioning of ecosystems and the survival of native species (Rodríguez, 2001).

Regarding environmental services, there is a precedent with the work of Martínez-Trinidad et al. (2021), who evaluated what the urban trees of the city of Texcoco de Mora provide, but it was only carried out for four parks and 391 individuals were registered compared to 1 325 for five parks in this work. Values above those mentioned by said authors were obtained for carbon capture in the Niños Héroes Park, where 3.35 Mg were recorded compared to 8.26 Mg, for the Elderly Age Park, 17.13 Mg compared to the current record of 22.41 Mg, and finally where there was the greatest difference due to the number of trees censused was in the Silverio Pérez Sports Park, where they calculated 16.76 Mg against 160.05 Mg in the present work. These differences are due to the number of trees counted and the time elapsed until 2023.

Based on the recognized relevance of the environmental services provided by green spaces to improve the quality of life of the population in urban environments, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a minimum threshold of 9 m2 of green space per inhabitant (ONU, 2015). According to this work, the city of Texcoco de Mora requires 8.14 m2 of tree cover per inhabitant to meet this condition, or in other words, 10.46 times the current estimated tree area in the five parks of Texcoco is required, from the data of these green areas.

Based on the work of Lüttge and Buckeridge (2020), due to the low population density, Texcoco has the potential to grow as a city characterized by its green infrastructure, which Quiroz (2018) defines as a natural environment with great importance in the mitigation and adaptation to climate change. However, if the authority does not provide the necessary support for the creation of green areas, as well as for the investigation of the current condition of other areas with urban vegetation such as medians, road trees and small dispersed parks, Texcoco will continue to be a case atypical outside of an ideal average with very little area of tree cover.

A city that has abundant trees projects a positive image to its visitors and this has effects on the local economy such as the creation of employment opportunities thanks to municipal policies focused on the generation of activities that involve green areas and maintenance of said spaces (Figueroa and Díaz-Galiano, 2018). In Texcoco, the lack of specialized maintenance is one of the main reasons that generates problems in urban trees. These problems turn into economic and environmental losses. That said, it is very valuable to establish new wooded areas in areas where there are none, so that little by little the city is filled with green areas, taking into account a functional design, as well as a correct selection of species and distribution to maximize the benefits they can provide.

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

The objective of this work was to make visible the environmental part offered by urban trees, and focused on five parks in the city of Texcoco de Mora.

i-Tree® Eco V6 software is a tool that, when used correctly, provides reliable data that can be used for making decisions about the administration and management of urban trees. However, user feedback is necessary to improve the software, because it has certain limitations, among which are that the program does not allow the registration and analysis of individuals whose crown height is less than the height of clean stem, as well as the lack of meteorological stations and updated years of pollutant registration.

A total value of 242.6 Mg was obtained for carbon stored in standing trees, 10.5 Mg annually for carbon capture and avoided runoff of 481.9 m3 annually for the five parks. 82 % of the censused trees correspond to exotic species. The green area factor per inhabitant is 0.86 m2 of green space per inhabitant for the city.

The data provided by this study brings forth key alternatives, such as the economic value, so that authorities can focus their attention on the real problems of the parks and thus they can become common spaces in excellent condition and thus contribute to a better quality of life for their residents.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The authors thank Eng. Abigail Ivonne Merino Laris for her help in collecting project data.

 

Conflict of interest

 

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

Contribution by author

 

Miguel Mancilla Morales: planning, data collection and analysis, writing of the manuscript; Leopoldo Mohedano Caballero: direction, planning and monitoring of the project, data analysis and review of the manuscript; Ro Linx Granados Victorino: project monitoring and manuscript review; Diódoro Granados Sánchez: direction, project monitoring and manuscript review; Alejandro Corona Ambriz: review of data and manuscript.

 

 

References

Almaguer H., S. N. 2006. La pérdida de la diversidad biológica: un problema de todos. LUZ 5(3):7-15. https://luz.uho.edu.cu/index.php/luz/article/view/256. (28 de agosto de 2023).

Arboreal. 2023. Arboreal®–Height of tree. https://www.arboreal.se/en/arboreal-forest. (20 de julio de 2023).

Badii, M. H., A. Guillen, C. E. Rodríguez, O. Lugo, J. Aguilar y M. Acuña. 2015. Pérdida de biodiversidad: causas y efectos. Daena: International Journal of Good Conscience 10(2):156-174. http://www.spentamexico.org/v10-n2/A10.10(2)156-174.pdf. (28 de agosto de 2023).

Bárcena, A., J. Samaniego, W. Peres y J. E. Alatorre. 2020. La emergencia del cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe ¿Seguimos esperando la catástrofe o pasamos a la acción? Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (Cepal) y Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). Santiago de Chile, RM, Chile. 375 p.

Calaza M., P. y M. I. Iglesias D. 2016. El riesgo del arbolado urbano. Contexto, concepto y evaluación. Mundi Prensa. Madrid, MD, España. 526 p. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305210265_El_riesgo_del_arbolado_urbano_Contexto_concepto_y_evaluacion. (14 de julio de 2023).

De la Concha, H. 2018. ¡-Tree ECO-Sistema de información para mejorar el arbolado público. Revista Parques:28-32. https://www.itreetools.org/documents/210/RevistaParques_Sept-Nov2018_iTreeEco.pdf. (14 de enero de 2023).

Figueroa C., M. E. y L. A. Díaz-Galiano M. 2018. Los árboles urbanos y la salud ambiental. Revista oficial de la Asociación Española de Arboricultura 80:54-59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342563818_Los_arboles_urbanos_y_la_salud_ambiental. (15 de julio de 2023).

Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). 2022. Biodiversity. https://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/background/regulatingservices/es/. (5 de agosto de 2023).

Giannotti, E., A. Vásquez y P. Velásquez. 2020. Policy Brief: Propuestas para un sistema de áreas verdes para ciudades sostenibles y saludables. Universidad de Chile. Santiago de Chile, RM, Chile. 10 p.

Hernández-López, P., T. Martínez-Trinidad, P. Hernández-de la Rosa, L. Mohedano-Caballero and M. de J. González G. 2023. Ecological characterization of trees at Molino de Flores Netzahualcóyotl National Park. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 29(3):93-108. Doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2023.01.002.

Herrera C., V. M. y M. de L. Romo A. 2021. La distribución de las áreas verdes públicas en relación con las características socioeconómicas de la población en Ciudad Juárez, México. Acta universitaria 31:e3101. Doi: 10.15174/au.2021.3101.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (Inegi). 2021. Principales resultados por localidad (ITER) del Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020. Datos oportunos. (MEX-INEGI.ESD2.01-CPV-2020). Inegi. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/descarga/ficha.html?tit=325913&ag=0&f=csv. (6 de enero de 2023).

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (Inegi). 2022. Espacio y datos de México. Sistemas de consulta. Inegi. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/mapa/espacioydatos/default.aspx?ag=150990001. (10 de enero de 2023).

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution of to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, CAM, United Kingdom. 3056 p.

i-Tree. 2021. i-Tree® Eco User’s Manual Versión 6.0. United States Department of Agriculture. Whashington, D. C., United States of America. 93 p. https://www.itreetools.org/documents/275/EcoV6_UsersManual.2021.09.22.pdf. (10 de enero de 2023).

Li, X., C. Zhang, W. Li, R. Ricard, Q. Meng and W. Zhang. 2015. Assessing street-level urban greenery using Google Street View and a modified green view index. Urban Forestry & Urban Green 14(3):675-685. Doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006.

Lüttge, U. and M. Buckeridge. 2020. Trees: structure and function and the challenges of urbanization. Trees 37:9-16. Doi: 10.1007/s00468-020-01964-1.

Martínez-Soto, J., M. Montero y L.-L. y J. M. de la Roca C. 2016. Efectos psicoambientales de las áreas verdes en la salud mental. Interamerican Journal of Psychology 50(2):204-214. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/284/28447010004.pdf. (15 de enero de 2023).

Martínez-Trinidad, T., P. Hernández L., S. F. López-López y L. Mohedano C. 2021. Diversidad, estructura y servicios ecosistémicos del arbolado en cuatro parques de Texcoco mediante i-Tree Eco. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 12(67):202-223. Doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v12i67.880.

Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). 2015. Habitat III 11-Espacio público. ONU. Nueva York, NY, Estados Unidos de América. 8 p. https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/Issue-Paper-11_Public_Space-SP.pdf. (11 de enero de 2023).

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (ONUAA). 2021. Los bosques para la salud y el bienestar de los seres humanos. Fortalecimiento del nexo entre los bosques, la salud y la nutrición. ONUAA. Roma, RM, Italia. 81 p.

Quiroz B., D. E. 2018. Implementación de infraestructura verde como estrategia para la mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático en ciudades mexicanas, hoja de ruta. Secretaria de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano (Sedatu), Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Semarnat) y Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Coyoacán, Cd. Mx., México. 69 p. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/394115/Hoja_de_ruta_IV_Infraestructura_Verde.pdf. (11 de enero de 2023).

Rodríguez, J. P. 2001. La amenaza de las especies exóticas para la conservación de la biodiversidad suramericana. Interciencia 26(10):479-483. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33906110. (14 de julio de 2023).

Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (Sader). 2020. Los árboles como fuente de vida indispensable. https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/articulos/los-arboles-como-fuente-de-vida-indispensable. (14 de agosto de 2023).

Seiferling, I., N. Naik, C. Ratti and R. Proulx. 2017. Green streets—Quantifying and mapping urban trees with street-level imagery and computer vision. Landscape and Urban Planning 165:93-101. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.010.

Zamora M., M. C. 2015. Cambio climático. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 6(31):4-7. https://cienciasforestales.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/forestales/article/view/190. (25 de enero de 2023).

 

 

        

Todos los textos publicados por la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales sin excepción– se distribuyen amparados bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0 Atribución-No Comercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 Internacional), que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.