Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales Vol. 17 (97)

Septiembre - Octubre (2026)

Logotipo, nombre de la empresa

Descripción generada automáticamente

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v17i97.1637

Research article

 

Equations for biomass estimation of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson in desert shrublands

Ecuaciones para la estimación de biomasa de Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson en matorrales desérticos

 

Pedro Jurado Guerra1, Gabriel Sosa Pérez1, José Luis García Pérez1*, Alan Álvarez Holguín2

 

 

Fecha de recepción/Reception date: 8 de febrero de 2026.

Fecha de aceptación/Acceptance date: 4 de mayo de 2026.

_______________________________

1Campo Experimental La Campana, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. México.

2Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología. México.

 

*Autor para correspondencia; correo-e: garciap.luis@inifap.gob.mx

*Corresponding author; e-mail: garciap.luis@inifap.gob.mx

 

 

Abstract

Tiquilia canescens is a shrub found in the desert scrublands of northern Mexico; because it is so abundant, it may play an important role in carbon sequestration and storage. However, there are no allometric functions for estimating its biomass. The objective of this study was to design equations to estimate the aboveground, root and total biomass of T. canescens. Allometric measurements were taken on 49 plants found in desert scrublands in the Aldama and Coyame del Sotol municipalities, state of Chihuahua. The fit of the linear, linearized potential allometric, and linearized exponential models for predicting biomass was evaluated. Based on fit statistics such as higher adjusted R2 values and lower Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) values, the variables with the greatest predictive power for total biomass were the long crown diameter (LCD, 47.9±18.0 cm), the short basal stem diameter (SBSD, 20.3±11.7 mm), and the canopy cover (CC, 1 754.4±1,342.8 cm2). The linearized potential model provided the best fit (lower RMSE and higher Pseudo-R2). Cross-validation was performed to test the predictive power of the equations. The final equations for estimating the aboveground, root, and total biomass of T. canescens included only the LCD, and these equations were robust and reliable for use in the Chihuahuan Desert scrubs and ecologically similar sites in North-central Mexico.

Keywords: Chihuahuan Desert, allometric equations, woody crinklemat, microphyllous scrub, rosette-forming scrub, linear models.

Resumen

Tiquilia canescens es una planta arbustiva de los matorrales desérticos del norte de México, debido a su abundancia puede desempeñar un papel importante en la captura y almacén de carbono. Sin embargo, no existen funciones alométricas para estimar su biomasa. El objetivo fue generar ecuaciones para estimar la biomasa aérea, radicular y total de T. canescens. Se realizaron mediciones alométricas en 49 plantas presentes en matorrales desérticos de los municipios Aldama y Coyame del Sotol, Chihuahua. Se evaluó el ajuste de los modelos lineal, alométrico potencial linealizado y exponencial linealizado para predecir la biomasa. Con base en estadísticos de ajuste como mayores R2ajustadas y menores criterios de información de Akaike (AIC), las variables con mayor capacidad predictiva de la biomasa total fueron el diámetro largo de copa (DLC, 47.9±18.0 cm), el diámetro basal corto del tallo (DCT, 20.3±11.7 mm) y la cobertura aérea (CA, 1 754.4±1 342.8 cm2). El modelo potencial linealizado presentó el mejor ajuste (menor RECM y mayor Pseudo-R2). Se realizó una validación cruzada para probar la capacidad predictiva de las ecuaciones. Las expresiones finales para estimar la biomasa aérea, radicular y total de T. canescens incluyeron solamente el DLC, las cuales fueron robustas, y confiables para su uso en matorrales desérticos de Chihuahua y sitios ecológicamente similares del norte-centro de México.

Palabras Clave: Desierto Chihuahuense, ecuaciones alométricas, hierba de la virgen, matorral micrófilo, matorral rosetófilo, modelos lineales.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

 

The xerophytic scrubs of Northern Mexico are ecosystems of great economic and environmental importance; they represent the country's largest vegetation type, covering 40 % of the national territory (Rzedowsky, 2006). These scrublands, used primarily for livestock grazing, are characterized by their growth on poor soils, with low precipitation and a high degree of degradation (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [Semarnat], 2016). In these ecosystems, the main plant communities—based on the area they occupy—are the microphyllous scrubs, which are dominated by Larrea tridentata (DC.) Coville (creosote bush) and Flourensia cernua DC. (tarbush); in addition to rosette-forming shrubland, dominated by Agave lechuguilla Torr. (lechuguilla) and Dasylirion wheeleri S. Watson ex Rothr. (sotol) (Granados-Sánchez et al., 2011).

The multiple services provided by these desert ecosystems are essential to the well-being, health, livelihoods, and survival of nearly 60 % of Mexico’s population (Briones et al., 2020). In the rosette-forming scrub, there are plants used for industrial purposes, such as sotol and lechuguilla (Rzedowski, 2006) and others, such as the woody crinklemat (Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson), which, while not of great economic value, plays an important ecological role, especially in carbon storage and sequestration. However, the impact of desert scrubs in the context of climate change has been little studied in Northern Mexico (Briones et al., 2018).

The challenges in estimating carbon stocks in xerophytic vegetation stem from the high diversity of shrubs present and the limited research on the species found there. There are some general equations for calculating the biomass of shrubs (Conti et al., 2019; Paz-Pellat et al., 2021), as well as some specific allometric equations for determining the biomass of the creosote bush, candelilla (Euphorbia antisyphilitica Zucc.) and lechuguilla (Flores-Hernández et al., 2020; Hernández-Ramos et al., 2019; Ludwig et al., 1975). However, no similar studies have been reported for T. canescens. This perennial shrub, 0.25 to 0.5 m tall and heavily branched from the base, has moderate forage value (Melgoza-Castillo et al., 2016; Mellado et al., 2005), its high abundance in the Chihuahuan Desert (Moore & Jansen, 2007) could serve as a significant carbon sink. The objective of this study was to develop allometric equations to estimate the aboveground, root, and total biomass of T. canescens in desert scrublands in Chihuahua, Mexico.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

 

Study area

 

 

The study was conducted at two sites, one in Aldama municipality and the other in Coyame del Sotol municipality, in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico (Figure 1). Both are located in the Central-eastern part of the state, within the region known as Sierras y Llanuras del Norte (Northern Plains and Sierras). The climate is dry and semi-warm, with a temperature of 18 °C and annual precipitation of 300 mm (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática [INEGI], 2010a, 2010b). The predominant soils are alluvial calcisols and leptosols, located within the Bravo-Conchos hydrological region. The vegetation in Aldama consists of microphyllous scrub (creosote bush and tarbush), while in Coyame, rosette-forming scrub (lechuguilla and sotol) predominates; both are found on low hillsides.

 

Sitio Coyame = Coyame site; Sitio Aldama = Aldama site.

Figure 1. Location of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson sampling sites in the desert scrubs of Chihuahua, Mexico.

 

 

Field sampling

 

 

In April 2023, 49 T. canescens plants of various sizes were selected to cover a wide range of heights and diameters. For each plant, the long crown diameter (LCD, cm), short crown diameter (SCD, cm) and total height (H, cm) from the ground to the top of the shrub were measured using a model ProLock Truper® 5 m measuring tape. Next, each plant was cut at ground level to obtain the aboveground biomass; the long base stem diameter (LBSD, mm) and the short base stem diameter (SBSD, mm) were measured using a model CAL-6MP Truper® digital caliper. Next, the root biomass was extracted; for this purpose, the area around the plant was dug up as deeply as possible to collect all visible roots. The aboveground and root biomass of 22 plants in Aldama and 27 in Coyame del Sotol were collected.

The biomass of each plant was washed to remove the dirt and dried for 30 days in a greenhouse at maximum temperatures of 50.9±0.5 °C. These materials were then transferred to a (model HS Riossa®) oven at 70 °C until they reached their anhydrous weight. Finally, the aboveground parts and roots of the plants were weighed on a model VE 5000 VELAB® digital scale, with an accuracy of 0.1 g. The total biomass per plant was calculated as the sum of aboveground and root biomass.

Based on the allometric variables measured in the field, the variables crown cover (CC), biovolume (Bvol) and Ludwig’s volume (LV) were calculated. For the CC, it was assumed that the crown was elliptical in shape; the equations of Conti et al. (2013) were used:

 

     (1)

 

     (2)

 

    (3)

 

Where:

CC = Crown cover area in cm2

LCD = Long crown diameter in cm

SCD = Short crown diameter in cm

Bvol = Apparent biovolume in m3

H = Plant height in cm

LV = Ludwig's spheroid volumein m3

Cr = Crown radius in cm

 

The Bvol and LV variables imply an apparent volume when the shape of the shrub is assumed to be that of a specific solid body. For Bvol, a cylindrical morphotype was considered (Blanco-Oyonarte & Navarro-Cerrillo, 2003); for LV, that of a spheroid corresponding to the upper half of the crown (Ludwig et al., 1975). The variables obtained in the field and those data-derived variables served as predictors for estimating the aboveground biomass (AB), the root biomass (RB) and the total biomass (TB).

 

 

Statistical analysis

 

 

A Pearson correlation analysis and a collinearity assessment using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) were performed among the predictor variables (Neter et al., 1983). Collinearity was assessed by fitting a multiple linear model with TB as the independent variable; AB and RB were excluded because they are components of TB. Because high correlation and structural multicollinearity were observed among the predictor variables—particularly the composite variables—and given practical constraints in the field and the principle of parsimony, it was decided to use a simple equation with a single variable (Cayuela & de la Cruz, 2022). To select this variable, the following goodness-of-fit statistics were considered: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), adjusted R2 (R2adj), and the Residual standard error (RSE).

After selecting the best predictor variable, the linear, exponential, and potential models for TB were evaluated. The ordinary least squares method was used; therefore, it was necessary to transform the last two models by applying logarithms. The predictions were converted to their original scale by applying a Correction factor (CF) to the constant in the equation (Baskerville, 1972). The selection of the best model was based on the Root mean square error (RMSE) and the Pseudo-R2 on the original scale (Baty et al., 2015).

A graphical analysis of the residuals was also performed to evaluate the assumption of homoscedasticity. The best model selected was fitted to the AB and RB variables. The goodness of fit of the final equations was assessed using the Adjusted coefficient of determination (R2aj), the RMSE, and the statistical significance (p<0.05).

To evaluate the predictive power of the models and rule out overfitting, given the small sample size (n=49), a leave-one-out cross-validation process was performed (James et al., 2021). During this process, the predictions were back-transformed and sequentially corrected to the original scale (g) to calculate the RMSE, the Mean absolute error (MAE), and a Validation coefficient of determination (R2vc) (Parresol, 1999). All analyses were performed using R, version 4.2.1 (R Core Team, 2024).

 

 

Results and Discussion

 

 

Allometric variables and biomass

 

 

Table 1 shows the statistics for the predictor and independent variables of T. canescens biomass.

 

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for allometric and biomass measures of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson in the desert scrubs of Chihuahua, Mexico (n=49).

Statistic

H

SCD

LCD

SBSD

LBSD

CC

Bvol

LV

AB

RB

TB

Mean

34.7

40.8

47.9

20.3

24.2

1 754

0.073

0.098

161.9

35.1

197.0

St. Dev.

10.9

16.2

18.0

11.7

14.5

1 343

0.079

0.106

175.0

37.4

209.2

Min. value

16

13

21

4.2

5.3

224

0.004

0.007

10.5

1.6

12.1

Max value

61

82

91

52.6

60.4

5 789

0.335

0.449

620.3

183.4

748.9

H = Plant height (cm); SCD = Short crown diameter (cm); LCD = Long crown diameter (cm); SBSD = Short basal stem diameter (mm); LBSD = Long basal stem diameter (mm); CC = Crown cover area (cm2); Bvol = Plant biovolume (m3); LV = Ludwig’s spheroid volume (m3); AB = Aboveground biomass (g plant-1); RB = Root biomass (g plant-1); TB = Total biomass (g plant-1).

 

The T. canescens population in the study area is stunted because the average height and crown diameter are less than 50 cm. These values are also lower than those of similar forage plants such as mariola (Parthenium incanum Kunth), for which the values cited by Villalobos (2007) are slightly higher (42.8 cm in height and 61.2 cm in LCD). The average AB and RB values in this study were higher than those reported for the same species by Hernández-Gómez et al. (2018) in desert scrubs of the states of Nuevo León and San Luis Potosí, with averages of 63.2 g plant-1 and 4.4 g plant-1, respectively; with an annual precipitation of 386 mm and a temperature of 17.2 °C. Hernández-Gómez et al. (2018) report a root-to-aboveground biomass ratio of 0.07, which is lower than the value of 0.216 obtained in the study documented herein. These differences can be attributed to the variability in ecological and edaphic conditions at each study site, since the growth of roots, stems, and leaves is influenced by various factors such as soil texture, structure, and compaction, as well as availability of moisture and nutrients (Barbour et al., 1987; Kramer, 1983).

 

 

Selection of predictor variables

 

 

The Pearson correlation coefficients among independent variables were significant (P≤0.001) and indicated a high correlation (Table 2). Most of the original and composite variables showed a high correlation with biomass (r=0.77 to 0.92; P<0.0001). The variable with the lowest correlation with biomass was height (r=0.70; P<0.0001), which suggests its low potential as a predictor variable.

 

Table 2. Correlation matrix of allometric variables and biomass of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson in Chihuahuan Desert scrubs (n=49).

Variable

H

SCD

LCD

SBSD

LBSD

CC

Bvol

LV

SCD

0.873

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCD

0.881

0.963

 

 

 

 

 

 

SBSD

0.677

0.757

0.798

 

 

 

 

 

LBSD

0.669

0.749

0.789

0.982

 

 

 

 

CC

0.868

0.979

0.963

0.768

0.770

 

 

 

Bvol

0.876

0.935

0.903

0.713

0.719

0.977

 

 

LV

0.878

0.935

0.906

0.715

0.722

0.978

0.999

 

AB

0.764

0.867

0.892

0.851

0.854

0.912

0.884

0.886

RB

0.701

0.781

0.811

0.925

0.908

0.806

0.770

0.773

TB

0.764

0.865

0.892

0.878

0.877

0.908

0.878

0.880

H = Plant height; SCD = Short crown diameter; LCD = Long crown diameter; SBSD = Short basal stem diameter; LBSD = Long basal stem diameter; CC = Crown cover area; Bvol = Plant biovolume; LV = Ludwig’s volume; AB = Aboveground biomass (g plant-1); RB = Root biomass (g plant-1); TB = Total biomass (g plant-1).

 

The VIF values for all predictor variables were above 10, indicating high multicollinearity (Neter et al., 1983). The lowest value was for height (18); values above 632 were for crown cover area and both volumes, suggesting high structural multicollinearity, because these variables were calculated based on crown diameters (SCD, LCD) and height. The high correlation among the variables justified the decision to select a simple equation with a single predictor variable; Table 3 shows the statistics used in this selection.

 

Table 3. Fitting statistics for individual predictor variables with the total biomass of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson.

Variable

R2adj

AIC

RSE

Long crown diameter (LCD)

0.862

57.57

0.4182

Short basal stem diameter (SBSD)

0.858

58.76

0.4233

Crown cover area (CC)

0.845

63.31

0.4434

Ludwig’s volume (LV)

0.829

67.90

0.4647

Biovolume (Bvol)

0.827

68.56

0.4678

Long basal stem diameter (LBSD)

0.825

69.25

0.4711

Short crown diameter (SCD)

0.793

77.50

0.5125

Plant height (H)

0.636

105.11

0.6793

R2adj = Adjusted coefficient of determination; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; RSE = Residual standard error.

 

The LCD variable showed the best fit statistics. Although the LCD and the SBSD showed statistically equivalent goodness-of-fit criteria (ΔAIC<2), the LCD was selected as the sole predictor variable. In practice, measuring the crown is quick and non-destructive, whereas measuring the basal diameter of the stem is difficult due to the low-growing shape of T. canescens. The third-best variable was CC; however, two measurements (LCD and SCD) are required to estimate it, and this takes more time.

Similar studies in desert scrubs (Flores-Hernández et al., 2020; Hernández-Ramos et al., 2019; Maldonado-Ortiz et al., 2022) have pointed out that crown diameter is essential for predicting the biomass of species like lechuguilla and candelilla. However, in other taxa found in desert ecosystems, it has been observed that the most common variables used to estimate biomass are those derived from the crown diameter and plant height (Ludwig et al., 1975; Rojas-García et al., 2015).

In this study, the correlation analysis and the statistics in Table 3 reveal that height is not a significant predictor. This contrasts with studies aimed at estimating biomass in other species of desert shrubs (Flores-Hernández et al., 2020; Hernández-Ramos et al., 2019; Ludwig et al., 1975; Maldonado-Ortiz et al., 2022), in which the height, either on its own or combined to form a composite variable (such as volume), has demonstrated strong predictive power.

Hernández-Gómez et al. (2018) analyzed the biomass of T. canescens and found that, in a quadratic model, height (R2adj=0.73) was the most significant variable for this estimate, while the model using crown diameter showed a moderate fit (R2adj=0.51). The low influence of height on biomass in this study can be explained, in part, by the limited vertical growth (Table 1), as the height measurements were similar for both younger specimens—identified by their small stem diameters—and adult specimens with larger stem diameters, which was reflected in a low correlation between the two variables.

 

 

Model fitting

 

 

The fit statistics for the three models evaluated are presented in Table 4; the relationship between TB and LCD is shown in Figure 2. The evaluation of the models showed that the potential (linearized using logarithms) provided the best fit for estimating TB. When the predictions were backtransformed to the original scale and CF was applied, the potential model had the lowest prediction error (RMSE=75.963) and the highest proportion of explained variance (Pseudo-R2=0.865). Although the linear model produced consistent statistics, its error was nearly 18 units higher than that of the linearized potential; furthermore, the linear model exhibited heteroscedasticity (Figure 3).

 

Table 4. Model structure and goodness-of-fit statistics for the models evaluated to predict total biomass (TB) based on the long crown diameter (LCD).

Model

Equation

Pseudo-R2

RMSE

Linear

0.796

93.499

Potential (Log)

0.865

75.963

Exponential

0.498

146.734

 

Figure 2. Relationship between the total biomass and the long crown diameter of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson using linear, potential (logarithmic), and exponential models (n=49).

 

Figure 3. Comparison of observed versus predicted residuals for the linear and linearized potential models using logarithms.

 

The linear model was inadequate for predicting the TB in very large or very small plants. The exponential model showed a very high error, which demonstrated that the biomass of T. canescens does not grow at an exponential rate relative to long crown diameter; therefore, it was also ruled out. Therefore, the linearized potential model was selected to generate the final equations as a function of the LCD, which predict TB, AB, and RB (Table 5).

 

Table 5. Equations for estimating the aboveground, root and total biomass of Tiquilia canescens (DC.) A. T. Richardson in the Chihuahuan Desert scrubs.

Equation

R2adj

CF

RMSE

0.866

1.090

75.96

0.797

1.130

21.29

0.862

1.091

60.76

AB = Aboveground biomass (g plant-1); RB = Root biomass (g plant-1); TB = Total biomass (g plant-1); LCD = Long crown diameter (cm); R2adj = Adjusted coefficient of determination; CF = Correction factor in the backtransformation; RMSE = Root of the mean square error.

 

The LCD-based equations were highly significant (p<0.001) for the biomass components of Tiquilia canescens (Table 5). The equations for TB and AB have adequate predictive power, as they account for more than 86 % of the observed variance, while the equation for root biomass has slightly lower predictive power (R2adj=0.79). The correction factors ranged between 1.090 and 1.130, indicating low back-transformation bias in all three components. The allometric exponents ranged between 2.55 and 2.75, indicating accelerated biomass accumulation (positive allometry) with increasing canopy.

The results are consistent with a study on Parthenium incanum (Villalobos, 2007), whose LCD is highly significant in explaining aboveground biomass, compared to height. Other studies to estimate the aboveground biomass of desert plants such as candelilla and lechuguilla (Flores-Hernández et al., 2020; Hernández-Ramos et al., 2019) point out that the best models include at least the variables crown diameter and plant height as predictor variables. The model of Ludwig (Ludwig et al., 1975) for the broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae (Pursh) Britton & Rusby), a shrub of similar size in the Chihuahuan Desert, was the only one that provided an acceptable fit and estimate of the aboveground biomass of T. canescens when using the crown cover area as an allometric variable.

In the case of root biomass, the findings contrast with those reported by Hernández-Gómez et al. (2018), who observed that crown diameter, when modeled using an exponential function, was an effective method for estimating the root biomass of T. canescens in the scrubs of the Southern ChihuahuanDesert. They also report that, using exponential models, root biomass can be estimated when height is combined with crown diameter, with an R2 ranging from 0.91 to 0.95.

Few studies have estimated the TB for desert shrubs; generally, only aboveground or root biomass is recorded (Hernández-Gómez et al., 2018; Ludwig et al., 1975). However, the TB is important for estimating carbon stocks and their contribution to climate change mitigation (Briones et al., 2018).

Cross-validation confirmed the high robustness and generalizability of the proposed equations, although there was a slight underestimation for large plants, particularly in the RB (Figure 4). These equations should be used only within the evaluated range, since they may lead to underestimating the biomass of individuals with larger crown diameters.

 

Figure 4. Observed and predicted values from cross-validation for total, aboveground and root biomass.

 

For the TB equation, the R2 value of 0.852 showed a minimal deviation (<1 %) from the fit reported in Table 5 (R2=0.862). On the original scale, the equation had an RMSE of 79.5 g and a MAE of 54.4 g. These predictive parameters were similar for aboveground biomass (R2=0.865, RMSE=63.5 g) and root biomass (R2=0.632, RMSE=22.505 g), with MAE values of 43.4 g and 13.3 g, respectively. In general, the predictive power of the equations is adequate because the biases are less than 2.9 % (Figure 4); this confirms that the LCD is a reliable variable for estimating biomass in T. canescens.

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

The linearized potential allometric equation provides the best predictive performance for estimating the aboveground, root, and total biomass of Tiquilia canescens when the long crown diameter, which is easy to measure, is used as the predictor variable. The derived biomass equations have practical implications for quantifying the carbon stock and forage availability of this taxon in the Chihuahuan Desert scrubs and similar ecological sites in north-central Mexico.

 

Acknowledgements

 

Thanks are due to the National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias) La Campana Experimental Field (Campo Experimental La Campana), for the facilities to carry out the study.

 

Conflict of interest

 

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

 

Contributions by author

 

All authors participated in the study design, fieldwork, and sample handling, as well as in the drafting, revision and final version of the manuscript. Gabriel Sosa Pérez and José Luis García Pérez: statistical analysis.

 

 

References

Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., & Pitts, W. D. (1987). Terrestrial plant ecology (2nd ed.). The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Terrestrial_Plant_Ecology.html?id=Ip3wAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Baskerville, G. L. (1972). Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forestry, 2, 49-53. https://www.esf.edu/quest/documents/Baskerville-1972-CJFR.pdf

Baty, F., Ritz, C., Charles, S., Brutsche, M., Flandrois, J.-P., & Delignette-Muller, M.-L. (2015). A toolbox for nonlinear regression in R: The package nlstools. Journal of Statistical Software, 66(5), 1-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282743750_A_Toolbox_for_Nonlinear_Regression_inR_The_Packagenlstools

Blanco-Oyonarte, P., & Navarro-Cerrillo, R. M. (2003). Aboveground phytomass models for major species in shrub ecosystems of western Andalusia. Investigación Agraria-Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 12(3), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.5424/1078

Briones, O., Búrquez, A., Martínez-Yrizar, A., Pavón, N., & Perroni, Y. (2018). Biomasa y productividad en las zonas áridas mexicanas. Madera y Bosques, 24(Especial), Artículo e2401898. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2018.2401898

Briones, O., Flores-Martínez, A., Castellanos, A. E., Perroni, Y., & Hernández-Guerrero, A. (2020). Población, servicios ecosistémicos, ciclo del carbono y políticas públicas en las zonas secas de México. Elementos para Políticas Públicas, 4(2), 79-97. https://www.elementospolipub.org/ojs/index.php/e pp/article/view/36

Cayuela, L., & de la Cruz, M. (2022). Análisis de datos ecológicos en R. Mundi-Prensa. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=RAB7EAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Conti, G., Enrico, L., Casanoves, F., & Díaz, S. (2013). Shrub biomass estimation in the semiarid Chaco forest: a contribution to the quantification of an underrated carbon stock. Annals of Forest Science, 70, 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0285-9

Conti, G., Gorné, L. D., Zeballos, S. R., Lipoma, M. L., Gatica, G., Kowaljow, E., Whitworth-Hulse, J. I., Cuchietti, A., Poca, M., Pestoni, S., & Fernandes, P. M. (2019). Developing allometric models to predict the individual aboveground biomass of shrubs worldwide. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28(7), 961-975. https://doi:10.1111/geb.12907

Flores-Hernández, C. de J., Méndez-González, J., Sánchez-Pérez, F. de J., Méndez-Encina, F. M., López-Díaz, Ó. M., & López-Serrano, P. M. (2020). Allometric equations for predicting Agave lechuguilla Torr. aboveground biomass in Mexico. Forests, 11(7), Article 784. https://doi:10.3390/f11070784

Granados-Sánchez, D., Sánchez-González, A., Granados-Victorino, R. L., & Borja-de la Rosa, A. (2011). Ecología de la vegetación del Desierto Chihuahuense. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 17(Edición Especial), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2010.10.102

Hernández-Gómez, M. Á., Pando-Moreno, M., Mata-González, R., González-Rodríguez, H., Chacón-Hernández, J., & Gutiérrez, M. (2018). Predicción de biomasa radicular en especies de pastizales semiáridos en el sur del Desierto Chihuahuense. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 9(50), 274-293. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v9i50.226

Hernández-Ramos, A., Cano-Pineda, A., Flores-López, C., Hernández-Ramos, J., García-Cuevas, X., Martínez-Salvador, M., & Martínez-Ángel, L. (2019). Modelos para estimar biomasa de Euphorbia antisyphilitica Zucc. en seis municipios de Coahuila. Madera y Bosques, 25(2), Artículo e2521806. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2019.2521806

Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. (2010a). Compendio de Información Geográfica Municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Aldama, Chihuahua, clave geoestadística 08002. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/app/mexicocifras/datos_geograficos/08/08002.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. (2010b). Compendio de Información Geográfica Municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Coyame del Sotol, Chihuahua, clave geoestadística 08015. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/app/mexicocifras/datos_geograficos/08/08015.pdf

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R (2nd ed.). Springer. https://www.casact.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/James-G.-et-al.-2nd-edition-Springer-2021.pdf

Kramer, P. J. (1983). Water relations of plants. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-01578-5

Ludwig, J. A., Reynolds, J. F., & Whitson, P. D. (1975). Size-biomass relationships of several Chihuahuan Desert shrubs. The American Midland Naturalist, 94(2), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/2424437

Maldonado-Ortiz, M., López-Serrano, P. M., Valdez-Cepeda, R. D., Mata-González, R., García-González, F., & Martínez-Salvador, M. (2022). Ecuaciones para estimar biomasa total de candelilla (Euphorbia antisyphilitica Zucc.) en Chihuahua. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 13(72), 173-200. https://doi:10.29298/rmcf.v13i72.1231

Melgoza-Castillo, A., Morales-Nieto, C. R., Royo-Márquez, M. H., Quintana-Martínez, G., Lebgue-Keleng, T., & Sierra-Tristan, S. (2016). Manual práctico para la identificación de las principales plantas en los agostaderos de Chihuahua. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua. https://isbnmexico.indautor.cerlalc.org/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=191993

Mellado, M., Rodríguez, A., Villareal, J. A., & Olvera, A. (2005). The effect of pregnancy and lactation on diet composition and dietary preference of goats in a desert rangeland. Small Ruminant Research, 58(1), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.07.014

Moore, M. J., & Jansen, R. K. (2007). Origins and biogeography of gypsophily in the Chihuahuan Desert plant group Tiquilia Subg. Eddya (Boraginaceae). Systematic Botany, 32(2), 392-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364407781179680

Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1983). Applied Linear Regression Models (2nd ed.). Richard D. Irwin, Inc. https://www.ime.unicamp.br/~dias/John%20Neter%20Applied%20linear%20regression%20models.pdf

Parresol, B. R. (1999). Assessing tree and stand biomass: A review with examples and critical comparisons. Forest Science, 45(4), 573-593. https://research.fs.usda.gov/download/treesearch/1180.pdf

Paz-Pellat, F., Velázquez-Rodríguez, A., Sánchez-Sánchez, C., Salas-Aguilar, V., Méndez-González, J., Acosta-Mireles, M., & Nájera-Luna, J. A. (2021). Alometría generalizada para la estimación de la biomasa aérea total de plantas leñosas: marco teórico general y aplicaciones. Madera y Bosques, 27(4), Artículo e2742442. https://doi:10.21829/myb.2021.2742442

R Core Team. (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 4.2.1) [Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rojas-García, F., De Jong, B. H. J., Martínez-Zurimendí, P., & Paz-Pellat, F. (2015). Database of 478 allometric equations to estimate biomass for Mexican trees and forests. Annals of Forest Science, 72, 835-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-015-0456-y

Rzedowski, J. (2006). Vegetación de México (1ra. Edición digital). Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4QXYW6LByLUeDNSaE5jUFBWbmM/view?resourcekey=0-47doiOVtp0RQ13PyUp1PLw

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. (2016). Informe de la situación del medio ambiente en México 2015. Compendio de Estadísticas Ambientales, Indicadores Clave, de Desempeño Ambiental y de Crecimiento Verde. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/161446/Cap_CC_completo.pdf

Villalobos, C. (2007). Estimating aboveground biomass of mariola (Parthenium incanum) from plant dimensions. In R. E. Sosebee, D. B. Wester, C. M. Britton, E. D. McArthur & S. G. Kitchen (Comps.), Proceedings: Shrubland dynamics—fire and water (pp. 132-135). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/28371

 

 

        

Todos los textos publicados por la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales sin excepción– se distribuyen amparados bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0 Atribución-No Comercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 Internacional), que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.